The actual number of Iraqi deaths recorded in Lancet’s latest study is just 547.Or, as he puts it in a later post:
Extrapolating from that figure, the study’s authors estimate: "... that as of July, 2006, there have been 654,965 excess Iraqi deaths as a consequence of the war."
Let’s put Lancet’s number in perspective:
* It is larger than the total number of Americans killed during combat in every major conflict, from the Revolutionary War to the first Gulf War.
* It is more than double the combined number of civilians killed in the bombings of Dresden, Hiroshima, and Nagasaki.
* It is a larger number than were killed in Germany during five years (and 955,044 tons) of WWII bombing.
Remember: Lancet came up with this via a survey that identified precisely 547 deaths (as reported by the New York Times).
Lancet’s number of documented deaths in Iraq, upon which the respected medical journal based its Iraqi mortality study, is but a mere 0.0835% of Lancet‘s estimated post-invasion death total. The “estimate” part of Lancet’s equation is 99.9%.
Yes, but remember: with New Math, the idea is the important thing.